Feedback Forum
Member Boardroom
About SWG's

           Click the tabs to navigate to the various site sections

SWGGUN HOMEObjectivesBylawsMembersGuidelinesResources
   
  The purpose of SWGGUN is to develop a series of consensus guidelines for the firearm and toolmark discipline and to disseminate SWGGUN guidelines, studies, and other findings that may be of benefit to the forensic community. The SWG meets twice annually.

Announcements   (archives)


Recently Updated

SWGGUN Guidelines
Admissibility Resource Kit
Appendix I-Visual Aids
CMS Survey Results

Spring 2008 SWGGUN Meeting Summary

Click image above to see the "Big" picture!   

The SWGGUN met in Woodbridge, Virginia, for their semi-annual meeting from 4/15- 17/2008. Fourteen members attended the meeting, along with the Association of Firearms and Tool Marks (AFTE) president, with seven Board members absent. Topics and issues covered during this meeting are listed below.

A presentation was given by Ms. Melissa Smrz, Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI Laboratory, to the SWGGUN Board detailing numerous administrative and policy issues related to all of the Scientific Working Groups (SWGs). During this presentation, Ms. Smrz conveyed that both the Department of Justice and the FBI are very satisfied with the work of all the SWGs. She encouraged us to continue to develop new guidelines, as well as reviewing established guidelines, to ensure that they are current and relevant. Finally, Ms. Smrz proposed that we consider the possibility of organizing a symposium to promote further standardization in the Firearm and Toolmark discipline.

The ARK Maintenance Committee presented the following reports to the Board:

  • Three new court rulings have recently been added to the ARK. These three admissibility rulings were all favorable rulings to the discipline and in two of these matters, the judge denied defense motions for a hearing as they considered Firearms and Toolmark Identification to be an established scientific discipline.
  • The Committee will also be including additional publication citations under the ARK’s Testability Section. These publications will provide additional theoretical and practical statistical validation of the Firearms and Toolmark discipline.

The SWGGUN Survey Committee reported that no new feedback was received since the last meeting on the SWGGUN’s CMS Survey.

The Criteria for Identification Committee reported no feedback on its proposed guidelines that reaffirmed the AFTE Theory of Identification. The Board reviewed the proposed guideline and then voted that this guideline be placed on the website for final posting.

The Standardized Comparison Documentation Committee reported no new feedback on its proposed guideline that essentially included contents of the AFTE comparison documentation standard with the addition of some verbiage that included CMS as a method that could be used in the text of examiners notes to describe examination conclusions. The Board reviewed the proposed guideline draft and determined that additional study should be conducted to note whether other imaging systems, such as Condor, be included in this guideline.

The ISO Committee presented its developed guideline text to the Board. After some discussion the ISO Committee will continue to revise its present guideline text by better defining, articulating and differentiating between “critical” and “uncertainty” of measurements.

Two new committees were formed during this meeting. These committees are the Gunshot Residue Pattern Testing and the Firearms Function Committees. Both of these committees will review the current examination protocols, as well as the conclusion criteria, used in these two areas of analysis.

The SWGGUN Chairman reported the following contacts since the last meeting:

  • The SWGGUN was contacted by the SWGs for Material Analysis and Shoeprint (SWGMAT & SWGTRAX). These SWGs, which are developing their own ARK contacted SWGGUN for details on website set-up and formatting information.
  • A response letter was received from the President of the California Association of Criminalists (CAC) denying our request for respondent raw data in the CAC Survey on consecutive matching striae (CMS). This letter was in response to the SWGGUN’s November, 2007 letter that requested the CAC’s raw survey data so that an external peer review could be conducted on the CAC’s Survey results.

During this meeting, SWGGUN members were afforded a tour of the National Rifle Association’s Firearm Museum in Fairfax, Virginia.

These committees are working to develop a product that can be posted on the SWGGUN website for review and comments from the forensic community. SWGGUN continues to operate its own website at www.swggun.org and solicits valuable input from the discipline through a number of different mechanisms during the development stages of the guidelines which we produce. These guideline/documents are then posted on the website for your review and we encourage peer review of these materials. Feel free to contact a Board member with your comments/concerns or visit us at the “Feedback Forum” tab above.

Thank you for allowing us to serve you. Board member information can be found under the “Members” tab. We look forward to hearing from you and encourage your continued participation in these ongoing projects that ultimately affect our work product.

Gregory S. Klees- Chair, SWGGUN
 

Home | Objectives | Bylaws | Members
Guidelines | Resources | Feedback Forum

Copyright © 2002-2008 Scientific Working Group for Firearms and Toolmarks (SWGGUN).
All rights reserved.  Revised: April 27, 2008.